Of course, The Wolf of Wall Street is quite candid about its leading character. As such, it seems to tease the audience: who would be able to refuse such luxury and such debauchery? There’s something delightful uncomfortable in how the film needles the viewer. Instead, The Wolf of Wall Street basks in its hedonism, affording its villainous protagonist almost unquestioned control of the narrative. In many ways, The Wolf of Wall Street plays like a belated companion piece to Goodfellas or Casino, a loose exploration of greed and corruption that avoids a lot of the easy moralising that audiences have come to expect from stories like this. He has used very little of that money to pay back the victims he swindled. The cruel gag extends even beyond the movie’s own narrative into the real world Belfort has boasted he made more from The Wolf of Wall Street than he did from his time on Wall Street. The Wolf of Wall Street alludes to this uncomfortable truth in its closing scene, as Belfort attracts an audience of people eager (and willing to pay) to learn his financial secrets. It turns out that – despite what we’d like to believe – crime does pay. Of course, our villain doesn’t really implode. The audience watching The Wolf of Wall Street knows the tale inside out: the arrogance, the hubris, the greed the consequences, the price, the fallout. Cinema audiences are quite familiar with this sort of story: the story of a wealthy crook who inevitably (and spectacularly) implodes. For a film that runs to almost three hours, the movie has a pretty straightforward plot. After all, the film does not have too much ground to actually cover. Still, The Wolf of Wall Street never feels like long film. Check back daily for the latest featured film.Įverything about The Wolf of Wall Street is excessive, even its length. With 2014 coming to a close, we’re counting down our top twelve films of the year.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |